Clinical Outcomes: Publications
RECELL® SYSTEM KNOWLEDGE BANK
Discover content that is distributed for public review, including publications in medical journals that provide a snapshot of AVITA Medical and results from the RECELL® System.
- Holmes et al. Burns. Demonstration of the safety and effectiveness of the RECELL® System combined with split-thickness meshed autografts for the reduction of donor skin to treat mixed-depth burn injuries. 2019 Jun;45(4):772-782. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.11.002
- Kowal et al. Adv Ther. Cost-Effectiveness of the Use of Autologous Cell Harvesting Device Compared to Standard of Care for Treatment of Severe Burns in the United States. 2019 May 7. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00961-2
- Holmes et al. J Burn Care Res. A Comparative Study of the RECELL® Device and Autologous Split-thickness Meshed Skin Graft in the Treatment of Acute Burn Injuries. 2018 Aug 17;39(5):694-702
- Sood et. al. Wounds. A comparative study of spray keratinocytes and autologous meshed split-thickness skin graft in the treatment of acute burn injuries. 2015 Feb:27(2):31-40
- Lim et. al. Burns. Is the length of time in acute burn surgery associated with poorer outcomes? 2014;40(2):235-40 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23876784/
- Johnstone et al. Burns. Successful application of keratinocyte suspension using autologous fibrin spray. 2017;43(3):e27-e30
- Chattopadhyay et al. J Burn Care Res. Autologous Skin Cell Suspension May Enhance Healing of Burn Wounds and Skin Graft Donor Sites in Elderly Burn Patients. 2020 Mar 41; Suppl 1: S100–S101.
- Holmes et al. J Burn Care Res. Real World Treatment Trends for Patients TBSA ≤ 20%: Evaluating Important Shifts in Care and Budget Impact of ASCS Adoption. 2020 Mar 41; Suppl 1: S115.
- Foster et al. J Burn Care Res. Budget impact of autologous cell harvesting device (ACHD) use versus standard of care (SOC) for treatment of severe burns: A case study for the Arizona Burn Center. 2019 Apr 40; Suppl 1: S165–S166.
- Hickerson et al. J Burn Care Res. A Comparative Study of Autologous Skin Cell Suspension to Split-thickness Autografting in the Treatment of Acute Burns. 2018 Apr 39; Suppl 1: S1.
- Holmes et al. J Burn Care Res. Demonstration of the Safety and Effectiveness of Autologous Skin Cell Suspension Combined with Meshed Skin Grafts for the Reduction of Donor Area in the Treatment of Acute Burns. 2018 Apr 39; Suppl 1: S60.
- Foster et al. J Burn Care Res. Cost-effectiveness of an Autologous Regenerative Epithelial Suspension versus Standard of Care for Treatment of Severe Burns in the United States. 2018 Apr 39; Suppl 1: S113.
- Wood et. al. Characterisation of the cell suspension harvested from the dermal epidermal junction using a RECELL® kit. 2012;(38):44-51
- Navarro et. al. J Burn Care & Res. Sprayed keratinocyte suspensions accelerate epidermal coverage in a porcine microwound model. 2000;21(6):513-8
- Wood et. al. The use of a non-cultured autologous cell suspension and Integra® dermal regeneration template to repair full-thickness skin wounds in a porcine model: A one-step process. 2007;33(6):693-700
- Kowal S, Kruger E, Bilir P, Holmes JH, Hickerson W, Foster K, Nystrom S, Sparks J, Iyer J, Bush K, Quick A. Cost-effectiveness of the Use of Autologous Cell Harvesting Device Compared to Standard of Care for Treatment of Severe Burns in the United States. Advances in Therapy. 2019 May 7:1-5.
- Kruger E, Kowal S, Bilir SP, Han E, Foster K. Relationship between patient characteristics and number of procedures as well as length of stay for patients surviving severe burn injuries: analysis of the American Burn Association National Burn Repository. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 2020 Mar 28.